Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Eritrea Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Immigrants from Eritrea
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from England
Immigrants from Eritrea
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
95.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
93.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Eritrea Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,444,946 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.316 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,849,484 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eritrea and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 0.56%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from England | Immigrants from Eritrea |
| Minimum | 0.60% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 17.9% | 9.2% |
| Range | 17.3% | 8.7% |
| Mean | 6.9% | 4.4% |
| Median | 5.6% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Eritrea by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (5.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Serbia (5.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Estonian (5.0%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eritrea are Immigrants from Lithuania (5.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Chilean (5.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Turkey (5.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Romania (5.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 96.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Ukrainians | 96.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 95.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 95.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 95.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Romanians | 95.0 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Mongolians | 94.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Estonians | 94.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Americans | 94.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 94.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Chickasaw | 94.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Osage | 94.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Maltese | 94.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 93.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 93.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 93.3 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 93.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Chileans | 93.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| South Africans | 92.6 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.1% |