Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from South Africa Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from South Africa
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from South Africa
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
96.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from South Africa Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,397,412 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,181,435 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.643 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 0.45%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from South Africa |
Minimum | 0.40% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 48.1% | 14.7% |
Range | 47.7% | 13.5% |
Mean | 6.2% | 5.9% |
Median | 4.7% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.9% | 6.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from South Africa by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from England (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Estonian (5.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Serbia (5.0%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Sudan (5.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Jordanian (5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Ukrainian (5.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Austria (5.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
Russians | 97.4 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Australia | 97.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Hungarians | 96.9 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 96.6 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 96.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Jordanians | 96.4 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 96.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 96.3 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 96.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Ukrainians | 96.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 95.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 95.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | England | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 95.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Romanians | 95.0 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Mongolians | 94.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Estonians | 94.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Americans | 94.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 94.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Chickasaw | 94.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Osage | 94.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.0% |