Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Europe Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Europe
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Europe
5.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT
74.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
UNEMPLOYMENT
86.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Europe Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,493,067 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.181 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 545,121,984 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Europe and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.499 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Europe |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 8.2% | 69.0% |
| Range | 6.6% | 66.5% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 8.1% |
| Median | 5.0% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 11.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Europe by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Potawatomi (5.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Syrian (5.2%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Europe are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Spain (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Hungary (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Europe | 86.3 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 86.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 86.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 85.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 85.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 85.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 84.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 83.4 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 83.2 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 82.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indonesians | 82.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 81.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 81.8 /100 | #146 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 81.6 /100 | #147 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 5.1% |
| Syrians | 77.7 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Potawatomi | 76.2 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 75.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 75.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 75.2 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 74.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.2% |