Chinese vs Croatian Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Chinese
Croatian
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Chinese
Croatians
4.5%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.7%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Croatian Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,725,695 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.049 and weighted average of 4.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 373,417,382 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 4.7%, a difference of 4.3%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Croatian |
Minimum | 1.8% | 0.80% |
Maximum | 10.0% | 24.9% |
Range | 8.2% | 24.1% |
Mean | 4.5% | 6.9% |
Median | 4.1% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.3% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 8.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Croatians by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are German (4.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Slovene (4.5%, a difference of 0.38%), Swedish (4.4%, a difference of 0.77%), Swiss (4.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and Scandinavian (4.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Carpatho Rusyn (4.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Latvian (4.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Polish (4.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Bulgarian (4.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and Fijian (4.7%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Hmong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Belgians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Finns | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.6% |
English | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Poles | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.7% |