Celtic vs Lithuanian Unemployment
COMPARE
Celtic
Lithuanian
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Celtics
Lithuanians
4.9%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Lithuanian Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,747,363 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Celtics and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,273,270 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.335 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Celtic | Lithuanian |
Minimum | 0.40% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 14.3% | 15.9% |
Range | 13.9% | 14.4% |
Mean | 5.5% | 5.7% |
Median | 4.8% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 6.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Lithuanians by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Singapore (4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Australian (4.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Eastern European (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and White/Caucasian (4.9%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Northern European (4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Bolivian (4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Czechoslovakian (4.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Filipino (4.8%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Lithuanians | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Northern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Filipinos | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Yugoslavians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Austrians | 99.5 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.8% |
French | 99.5 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |
French Canadians | 99.3 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Whites/Caucasians | 99.2 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.2 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Australians | 99.2 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Celtics | 99.1 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.9% |