Yuman vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Yuman
Chinese
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Yuman
Chinese
28.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yuman vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,623,362 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 28.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,759,689 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.266 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 142.7%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yuman | Chinese |
Minimum | 5.3% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 56.0% |
Range | 94.7% | 53.7% |
Mean | 40.6% | 14.3% |
Median | 33.4% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.5% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 56.7% | 17.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 38.2% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 27.4% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.7% | 11.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Yuman by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Pima (29.0%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.1%, a difference of 0.46%), Navajo (30.2%, a difference of 4.4%), Hopi (27.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and Lumbee (31.0%, a difference of 7.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.1% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.2% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.0% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.2% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.0% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.7% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.1%, a difference of 1.8%), Iranian (12.2%, a difference of 2.6%), Thai (11.6%, a difference of 3.1%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and Immigrants from Iran (12.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |