White/Caucasian vs Pima Female Poverty
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Pima
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Pima
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
54.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Pima Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,112,868 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.887 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,538,212 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.588 and weighted average of 23.6%, a difference of 76.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | White/Caucasian | Pima |
| Minimum | 10.3% | 5.7% |
| Maximum | 33.9% | 79.5% |
| Range | 23.6% | 73.8% |
| Mean | 16.7% | 28.6% |
| Median | 16.5% | 24.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.6% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.6% | 37.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 19.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 16.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 15.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
| Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Lumbee (23.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Navajo (23.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Yemen (22.8%, a difference of 3.3%), Crow (22.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and Puerto Rican (25.2%, a difference of 6.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 25.9% |