White/Caucasian vs Immigrants from Jordan Family Poverty
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Immigrants from Jordan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Immigrants from Jordan
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
69.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Immigrants from Jordan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,762,373 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.883 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,199,618 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 2.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | White/Caucasian | Immigrants from Jordan |
Minimum | 6.3% | 0.79% |
Maximum | 30.1% | 38.9% |
Range | 23.8% | 38.1% |
Mean | 12.0% | 9.3% |
Median | 11.9% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.7% | 10.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians and Immigrants from Jordan by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Oceania (8.7%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |