Turkish vs Lithuanian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Turkish
Lithuanian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Turks
Lithuanians
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Lithuanian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,078,703 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.344 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 411,360,859 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.662 and weighted average of 14.0%, a difference of 2.7%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Lithuanian |
Minimum | 0.40% | 7.6% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 66.3% | 92.4% |
Mean | 13.5% | 26.4% |
Median | 10.7% | 18.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 11.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.8% | 34.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 22.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 22.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 22.2% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Lithuanians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Swedish (13.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from China (13.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Cypriot (13.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Danish (13.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Korean (14.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Asia (13.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Australia (13.9%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.9%, a difference of 0.47%), and Croatian (14.0%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Asians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Cypriots | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Turks | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Danes | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.6 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |