Turkish vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Turks
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 244,728,482 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,451,408 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.699 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 0.080%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Minimum | 3.3% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 62.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 58.9% | 98.5% |
Mean | 18.2% | 24.8% |
Median | 13.8% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.6% | 30.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 18.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.0% | 20.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 20.2% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Israel (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), South American (12.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Eritrea (12.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Colombia (12.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Chile (12.1%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from Chile (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Colombia (12.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Israel (12.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Armenian (12.1%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Chileans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Uruguayans | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.1 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Armenians | 98.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | South America | 98.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Israel | 98.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South Americans | 98.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Colombians | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.2% |