Turkish vs Central American Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Turkish
Central American
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Turks
Central Americans
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
281st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Central American Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,627,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,924,631 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.463 and weighted average of 20.2%, a difference of 47.9%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Central American |
Minimum | 0.50% | 4.9% |
Maximum | 71.9% | 69.0% |
Range | 71.4% | 64.1% |
Mean | 13.5% | 24.6% |
Median | 11.2% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 18.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.1% | 29.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.5% | 11.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 11.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Turks by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Liberia (20.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Zaire (20.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Barbadian (20.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Belizean (20.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and West Indian (20.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 20.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.1% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.2% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 20.2% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 20.2% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 20.3% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 20.3% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 20.3% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 20.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 20.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 20.5% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 20.5% |