Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Yugoslavian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Yugoslavian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Yugoslavians
15.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
76.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Yugoslavian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,692,358 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,591,967 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 18.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 32.1% | 30.2% |
| Range | 30.1% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 14.8% | 12.4% |
| Median | 13.9% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.1% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Liberian (15.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (15.4%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (15.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and Jamaican (15.5%, a difference of 0.61%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |