Tongan vs Immigrants from Philippines Male Poverty
COMPARE
Tongan
Immigrants from Philippines
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Tongans
Immigrants from Philippines
9.7%
MALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
MALE POVERTY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tongan vs Immigrants from Philippines Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,857,132 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.360 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,810,616 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.159 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 2.8%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tongan | Immigrants from Philippines |
Minimum | 2.9% | 0.87% |
Maximum | 21.0% | 17.3% |
Range | 18.2% | 16.4% |
Mean | 9.1% | 8.9% |
Median | 8.5% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 10.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Tongans and Immigrants from Philippines by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Polish (9.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Macedonian (9.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.7%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Poland (9.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and Iranian (9.8%, a difference of 0.74%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Slovene (10.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Japan (10.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Singapore (10.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Turkish (10.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Serbia (10.0%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Macedonians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Iranians | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Czechs | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.2 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Russians | 99.2 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Cypriots | 99.2 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Turks | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 98.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 98.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 10.0% |