Tlingit-Haida vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Receiving Food Stamps

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,831,023 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.282 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,553,745 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.046 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 4.6%.

Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary

Measurement	Tlingit-Haida	Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Minimum	0.70%	2.7%
Maximum	59.7%	22.4%
Range	59.0%	19.7%
Mean	15.8%	11.3%
Median	10.7%	11.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	7.0%	9.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	18.2%	12.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.2%	3.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	14.4%	3.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	14.2%	3.1%

Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia by Receiving Food Stamps

In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Kenyan (11.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Belarus (11.5%, a difference of 0.54%), Arab (11.5%, a difference of 0.85%), Immigrants from Chile (11.5%, a difference of 0.90%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.5%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are Brazilian (11.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Soviet Union (11.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Spain (11.1%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (11.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and Lebanese (11.1%, a difference of 0.43%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Receiving Food Stamps
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	83.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 11.1%
Brazilians	83.2 /100 \| #149	Excellent 11.1%
Soviet Union	83.1 /100 \| #150	Excellent 11.1%
Immigrants \| Spain	81.7 /100 \| #151	Excellent 11.1%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	81.7 /100 \| #152	Excellent 11.1%
Lebanese	81.6 /100 \| #153	Excellent 11.1%
Armenians	81.4 /100 \| #154	Excellent 11.1%
Immigrants \| Argentina	80.4 /100 \| #155	Excellent 11.2%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	75.6 /100 \| #156	Good 11.3%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	75.2 /100 \| #157	Good 11.3%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	72.6 /100 \| #158	Good 11.3%
Immigrants \| Oceania	70.4 /100 \| #159	Good 11.4%
French Canadians	69.5 /100 \| #160	Good 11.4%
Pennsylvania Germans	68.4 /100 \| #161	Good 11.4%
Alsatians	68.0 /100 \| #162	Good 11.4%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	65.8 /100 \| #163	Good 11.5%
Immigrants \| Chile	65.0 /100 \| #164	Good 11.5%
Arabs	64.7 /100 \| #165	Good 11.5%
Immigrants \| Belarus	62.8 /100 \| #166	Good 11.5%
Kenyans	60.2 /100 \| #167	Good 11.6%
Tlingit-Haida	59.1 /100 \| #168	Average 11.6%