Tlingit-Haida vs Costa Rican Male Poverty
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Costa Rican
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Costa Ricans
10.9%
MALE POVERTY
76.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
63.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Costa Rican Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,854,564 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,451,633 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 1.5%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Costa Rican |
Minimum | 2.6% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 28.9% | 31.0% |
Range | 26.3% | 29.8% |
Mean | 11.7% | 10.2% |
Median | 11.6% | 9.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.1% | 11.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida and Costa Ricans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from France (10.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jordan (10.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Basque (10.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Yugoslavian (10.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Afghan (10.9%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Scotch-Irish (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (11.0%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |