Swiss vs Native Hawaiian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Swiss
Native Hawaiian
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Swiss
Native Hawaiians
9.2%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.4%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Native Hawaiian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,823,104 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.516 and weighted average of 9.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 330,714,575 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220 and weighted average of 9.4%, a difference of 2.2%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Swiss | Native Hawaiian |
Minimum | 3.4% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 68.4% | 29.8% |
Range | 65.1% | 28.6% |
Mean | 12.6% | 10.0% |
Median | 8.3% | 9.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 12.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.0% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Native Hawaiians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Thai (9.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Slovak (9.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Scottish (9.2%, a difference of 0.32%), European (9.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and Luxembourger (9.2%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Northern European (9.4%, a difference of 0.020%), British (9.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Finnish (9.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Latvian (9.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and Menominee (9.4%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Scottish | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Slovaks | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Thais | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Welsh | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Irish | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Italians | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Menominee | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Finns | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Native Hawaiians | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.4% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |