Sudanese vs Immigrants from Eastern Africa Family Poverty
COMPARE
Sudanese
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Sudanese
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
10.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
3.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
15.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Immigrants from Eastern Africa Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,085,531 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 354,301,294 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.724 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 5.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sudanese | Immigrants from Eastern Africa |
Minimum | 1.9% | 5.3% |
Maximum | 36.9% | 42.2% |
Range | 35.0% | 36.8% |
Mean | 11.5% | 12.5% |
Median | 9.2% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 8.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.1% | 14.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese and Immigrants from Eastern Africa by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Armenia (10.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Ottawa (10.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants (10.0%, a difference of 0.49%), Marshallese (9.9%, a difference of 0.74%), and Immigrants from Africa (9.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Africa are Immigrants from Uruguay (9.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Alsatian (9.6%, a difference of 1.0%), Malaysian (9.6%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Thailand (9.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and Osage (9.7%, a difference of 2.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 9.5% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |