Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Poverty
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Immigrants from Ghana
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Immigrants from Ghana
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,098,570 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,614,936 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 0.030%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Subsaharan African | Immigrants from Ghana |
Minimum | 0.78% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 62.5% | 31.3% |
Range | 61.7% | 29.3% |
Mean | 15.6% | 11.0% |
Median | 11.1% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.4% | 13.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and Immigrants from Ghana by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |