Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Moldova Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 429,284,128 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 18.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,051,261 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 17.9%, a difference of 1.8%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Sri Lankan	Immigrants from Moldova
Minimum	3.3%	5.6%
Maximum	40.0%	100.0%
Range	36.7%	94.4%
Mean	17.3%	23.5%
Median	16.2%	16.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	13.4%	14.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	19.3%	22.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.0%	8.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.2%	20.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.2%	20.5%

Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Immigrants from Moldova by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Bhutanese (18.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Asian (18.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (18.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Samoan (18.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Spanish American Indian (18.1%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Moldova are Native Hawaiian (17.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (17.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Greece (17.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from South America (17.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (17.8%, a difference of 0.25%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 17.8%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 17.8%
Immigrants \| Moldova	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 17.9%
Native Hawaiians	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 17.9%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 17.9%
Immigrants \| Greece	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 17.9%
Immigrants \| South America	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 17.9%
Immigrants \| Croatia	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 17.9%
South Americans	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 18.0%
Puget Sound Salish	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 18.0%
Immigrants \| Romania	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 18.0%
Immigrants \| Argentina	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 18.0%
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 18.1%
Macedonians	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 18.1%
Nicaraguans	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 18.1%
Spanish American Indians	100.0 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 18.1%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 18.2%
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 18.2%
Sri Lankans	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 18.2%
Bhutanese	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 18.2%
Samoans	100.0 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 18.2%