Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from China Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Immigrants from China
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Sri Lankans
Immigrants from China
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
72.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from China Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 436,204,277 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 451,197,331 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.601 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 2.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sri Lankan | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 0.96% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 36.6% | 20.0% |
Range | 35.6% | 18.9% |
Mean | 6.8% | 5.8% |
Median | 5.5% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 6.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Immigrants from China by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Argentinean (5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Delaware (5.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.1%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Brazil (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Portugal (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), German Russian (5.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Hmong (5.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |