South American vs Italian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
South American
Italian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
South Americans
Italians
16.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
55.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Italian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,291,014 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.116 and weighted average of 16.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 553,398,049 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.511 and weighted average of 14.2%, a difference of 15.0%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American | Italian |
Minimum | 5.4% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 45.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 39.7% | 98.9% |
Mean | 16.5% | 16.8% |
Median | 15.5% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.3% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.7% | 14.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 21.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 20.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to South Americans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Afghan (16.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (16.4%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (16.4%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Colombia (16.4%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.3 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 69.6 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Costa Ricans | 68.1 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 67.9 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Colombians | 65.2 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 63.6 /100 | #166 | Good 16.2% |
Afghans | 55.4 /100 | #167 | Average 16.3% |
South Americans | 55.3 /100 | #168 | Average 16.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 53.6 /100 | #169 | Average 16.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 51.7 /100 | #170 | Average 16.4% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 51.3 /100 | #171 | Average 16.4% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 50.8 /100 | #172 | Average 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 50.5 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |
Uruguayans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.4% |
Immigrants | Syria | 49.0 /100 | #175 | Average 16.5% |
Demographics Similar to Italians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Immigrants from Greece (14.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Czech (14.1%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Indonesia (14.1%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Moldova (14.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and Laotian (14.3%, a difference of 0.82%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.4 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Italians | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Laotians | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Poles | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |