South African vs Immigrants from Switzerland Male Poverty
COMPARE
South African
Immigrants from Switzerland
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
South Africans
Immigrants from Switzerland
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
86.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
79.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Immigrants from Switzerland Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,517,352 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.864 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,054,037 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Switzerland and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.079 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 1.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South African | Immigrants from Switzerland |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 0.91% |
| Maximum | 75.0% | 48.0% |
| Range | 73.0% | 47.1% |
| Mean | 9.9% | 10.6% |
| Median | 7.2% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.1% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.8% | 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and Immigrants from Switzerland by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are French (10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Native Hawaiian (10.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (10.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from China (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Norway (10.7%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Switzerland are Yugoslavian (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Israel (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Jordan (10.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Tlingit-Haida (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 0.57%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
| South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
| French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |