Slovak vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Slovak
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Slovaks
Immigrants from Costa Rica
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
39.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
183rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slovak vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 389,214,843 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 21.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,952,607 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.094 and weighted average of 20.9%, a difference of 1.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slovak | Immigrants from Costa Rica |
| Minimum | 10.7% | 7.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 52.6% |
| Range | 89.3% | 45.2% |
| Mean | 34.3% | 22.0% |
| Median | 25.1% | 20.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.8% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.8% | 24.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.0% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.3% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.1% | 8.7% |
Demographics Similar to Slovaks and Immigrants from Costa Rica by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slovaks are Hungarian (21.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (21.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Cambodia (21.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and European (21.1%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Ugandan (20.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.54%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
| Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
| Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |