Slavic vs Immigrants from South Africa Male Poverty
COMPARE
Slavic
Immigrants from South Africa
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Slavs
Immigrants from South Africa
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
91.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
94.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Immigrants from South Africa Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,742,219 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.590 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,179,579 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.815 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 0.96%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic | Immigrants from South Africa |
| Minimum | 0.066% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 41.3% | 75.0% |
| Range | 41.2% | 73.9% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 11.9% |
| Median | 9.3% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 13.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 13.0% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs and Immigrants from South Africa by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Welsh (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.020%), French Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Scottish (10.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Egypt (10.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Jordanian (10.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Australian (10.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Romanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |