Slavic vs Australian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Slavic
Australian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Slavs
Australians
4.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Australian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,876,285 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.830 and weighted average of 4.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,779,850 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.805 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 3.1%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Slavic | Australian |
Minimum | 0.99% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 40.0% | 73.3% |
Range | 39.0% | 72.2% |
Mean | 7.6% | 6.5% |
Median | 5.1% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.3% | 5.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 10.6% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs and Australians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Canada (4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Serbia (4.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Macedonian (4.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (4.4%, a difference of 0.66%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (4.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and Welsh (4.3%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Tlingit-Haida | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Slavs | 99.4 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 4.4% |