Sierra Leonean vs Polish Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Sierra Leonean
Polish
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Sierra Leoneans
Poles
19.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sierra Leonean vs Polish Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,185,885 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.127 and weighted average of 19.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 540,648,270 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 1.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sierra Leonean | Polish |
Minimum | 1.1% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 42.4% | 77.8% |
Range | 41.2% | 72.7% |
Mean | 17.6% | 19.6% |
Median | 18.6% | 18.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.4% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.5% | 21.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Sierra Leoneans and Poles by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Immigrants from France (19.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Ukrainian (19.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Belgium (19.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Cameroon (19.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (19.9%, a difference of 0.56%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Colombia (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | France | 97.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 19.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 19.8% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 97.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 19.8% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 97.1 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |