Serbian vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Serbian
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Serbians
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
20.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
93.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Serbian vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,350,230 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Serbians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 20.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,624,577 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 0.79%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Serbian | Immigrants from Kazakhstan |
Minimum | 5.0% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 56.7% | 56.0% |
Range | 51.7% | 52.6% |
Mean | 21.7% | 23.2% |
Median | 20.7% | 20.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 17.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.4% | 28.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 10.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 10.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 9.9% |
Demographics Similar to Serbians and Immigrants from Kazakhstan by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Mongolian (20.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Colombia (20.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Polish (20.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (20.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Netherlands (20.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |