Scotch-Irish vs Sri Lankan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Scotch-Irish
Sri Lankan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Scotch-Irish
Sri Lankans
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
82.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scotch-Irish vs Sri Lankan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 545,166,810 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.785 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 439,246,520 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 1.2%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Scotch-Irish | Sri Lankan |
Minimum | 3.0% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 45.5% |
Range | 97.0% | 43.2% |
Mean | 17.2% | 10.8% |
Median | 10.8% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.4% | 11.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.9% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish and Sri Lankans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.25%), Albanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Chilean (8.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Brazil (8.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (8.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Argentina (8.4%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |