Romanian vs Palestinian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Romanian
Palestinian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Romanians
Palestinians
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
95.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian vs Palestinian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 369,938,935 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.478 and weighted average of 15.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,720,256 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 0.54%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Romanian | Palestinian |
Minimum | 4.0% | 0.56% |
Maximum | 70.0% | 62.9% |
Range | 66.0% | 62.3% |
Mean | 23.0% | 17.9% |
Median | 16.3% | 14.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.8% | 23.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.5% | 13.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.3% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.0% | 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to Romanians and Palestinians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Chilean (15.1%, a difference of 0.15%), British (15.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from South Africa (15.0%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from Croatia (15.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Serbian (15.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Dutch (15.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Latvia | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Basques | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Paraguayans | 95.7 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
British | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Romanians | 95.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | England | 95.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Chileans | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 94.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Dutch | 94.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Sri Lankans | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |