Pueblo vs Australian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Pueblo
Australian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Pueblo
Australians
25.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pueblo vs Australian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,548,196 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pueblo and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.216 and weighted average of 25.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,150,197 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.510 and weighted average of 14.8%, a difference of 70.4%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pueblo | Australian |
Minimum | 5.9% | 5.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 60.2% |
Range | 94.1% | 54.9% |
Mean | 34.3% | 19.5% |
Median | 24.5% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.5% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.1% | 26.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.5% | 14.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.9% | 11.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.7% | 11.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Pueblo by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pueblo are Menominee (25.0%, a difference of 0.70%), Sioux (25.6%, a difference of 1.5%), Black/African American (24.7%, a difference of 2.2%), Yup'ik (25.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 4.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Swiss (14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Jordanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Soviet Union (14.8%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Turkey | 97.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Egyptians | 97.9 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Austrians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 96.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 14.9% |