Potawatomi vs Comanche Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Potawatomi
Comanche
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Potawatomi
Comanche
15.8%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Potawatomi vs Comanche Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,014,628 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.453 and weighted average of 15.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,456,343 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 16.0%, a difference of 1.6%.
![Potawatomi vs Comanche Single Male Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/single-male-poverty/potawatomi-vs-comanche-single-male-poverty-chart.webp)
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Potawatomi | Comanche |
Minimum | 3.4% | 12.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 59.4% |
Range | 96.6% | 46.9% |
Mean | 28.9% | 29.8% |
Median | 24.3% | 27.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.3% | 18.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.0% | 40.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.7% | 22.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.6% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.3% | 13.0% |
Demographics Similar to Potawatomi and Comanche by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are American (15.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Ute (15.7%, a difference of 0.57%), Yakama (15.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Pennsylvania German (15.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Seminole (16.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Seminole (16.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Cherokee (16.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Alaskan Athabascan (16.1%, a difference of 0.52%), Yakama (15.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and Cheyenne (16.1%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 15.1% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 15.2% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 15.2% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 15.4% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 15.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.7% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.8% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |