Portuguese vs Pakistani Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Portuguese
Pakistani
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Portuguese
Pakistanis
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
90.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
91.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Portuguese vs Pakistani Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 444,338,613 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 333,364,420 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.716 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 0.43%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Portuguese | Pakistani |
Minimum | 1.0% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 43.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 42.1% | 95.7% |
Mean | 16.1% | 22.3% |
Median | 13.5% | 15.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.4% | 24.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 18.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 18.8% |
Demographics Similar to Portuguese and Pakistanis by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Immigrants from Western Europe (15.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Palestinian (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (15.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Czechoslovakian (15.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are South African (15.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Czechoslovakian (15.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Scottish (15.0%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Sri Lankans | 93.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.1 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 93.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Scottish | 92.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.0% |
South Africans | 92.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Pakistanis | 91.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 91.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 90.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Portuguese | 90.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.3 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 90.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 89.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 15.1% |
Mongolians | 89.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 15.2% |
Armenians | 89.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 15.2% |
Canadians | 89.1 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.2% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.2% |
Native Hawaiians | 88.7 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.2% |