Polish vs Latvian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Polish
Latvian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Poles
Latvians
11.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Latvian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 559,323,396 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.225 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,618,449 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 2.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Polish | Latvian |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 87.1% | 31.3% |
| Range | 85.5% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 13.1% | 10.2% |
| Median | 10.3% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.4% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Latvians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Danish (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Cypriot (11.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Greek (11.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Korea (11.7%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Lithuanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Bolivian (11.5%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Scotland (11.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and Norwegian (11.5%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |