Polish vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Polish
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Poles
Immigrants from Ethiopia
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 540,648,270 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,222,797 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.027 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 0.080%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Polish | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
Minimum | 5.1% | 9.4% |
Maximum | 77.8% | 33.7% |
Range | 72.7% | 24.3% |
Mean | 19.6% | 19.6% |
Median | 18.3% | 19.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.0% | 17.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.4% | 21.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Immigrants from Ethiopia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Colombia (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.0%), South American (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |