Pima vs Immigrants from Lithuania Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Pima
Immigrants from Lithuania
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Pima
Immigrants from Lithuania
29.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Immigrants from Lithuania Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,443,182 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 29.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,734,121 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 120.6%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima | Immigrants from Lithuania |
Minimum | 10.7% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 26.1% |
Range | 89.3% | 23.7% |
Mean | 38.9% | 11.0% |
Median | 35.3% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.0% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.5% | 13.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 29.4% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.1% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.6% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Pima by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Navajo (30.3%, a difference of 1.8%), Yuman (30.6%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 3.1%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and Lumbee (31.9%, a difference of 7.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.5% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 26.3% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.7% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 30.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.6% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Okinawan (13.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bolivia (13.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Asian (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and Cypriot (13.6%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Asians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Cypriots | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Turks | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.6% |