Ottawa vs Cherokee Family Poverty
COMPARE
Ottawa
Cherokee
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Ottawa
Cherokee
10.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
3.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ottawa vs Cherokee Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,932,404 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.017 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,113,161 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 6.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ottawa | Cherokee |
Minimum | 0.96% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 22.5% | 50.0% |
Range | 21.5% | 47.1% |
Mean | 10.0% | 15.7% |
Median | 9.9% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.1% | 17.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Ottawa and Cherokee by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Immigrants from Armenia (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Sudanese (10.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (10.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Panama (10.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and Alaskan Athabascan (10.1%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (10.5%, a difference of 0.64%), Cree (10.5%, a difference of 1.3%), Nepalese (10.4%, a difference of 1.7%), Alaska Native (10.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and Ghanaian (10.3%, a difference of 3.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |