Osage vs Liberian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Osage
Liberian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Osage
Liberians
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
18.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
26.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Liberian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,686,169 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,684,322 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage | Liberian |
Minimum | 0.88% | 0.41% |
Maximum | 28.6% | 18.2% |
Range | 27.7% | 17.8% |
Mean | 7.1% | 5.4% |
Median | 5.3% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.6% | 6.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Liberians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Chippewa (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Africa (5.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), French American Indian (5.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Syria (5.5%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Immigrants from Belarus (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Spaniard (5.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from the Azores (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Uruguayan (5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 30.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 5.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 30.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.3% |
Malaysians | 29.5 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 27.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 27.5 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.4% |
Spaniards | 27.4 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.4% |
Liberians | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |