Norwegian vs Bhutanese Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Norwegian
Bhutanese
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Norwegians
Bhutanese
9.0%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.2%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Bhutanese Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,518,584 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.057 and weighted average of 9.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,770,052 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 9.2%, a difference of 2.9%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
Measurement | Norwegian | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 1.1% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 33.3% | 32.4% |
Range | 32.2% | 31.4% |
Mean | 8.2% | 10.2% |
Median | 7.5% | 8.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.1% | 12.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Norwegians and Bhutanese by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Japan (9.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Scotland (9.0%, a difference of 0.43%), Maltese (8.9%, a difference of 0.66%), Bulgarian (8.9%, a difference of 0.79%), and Danish (9.0%, a difference of 0.88%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Czech (9.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swedish (9.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Ireland (9.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.2%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |