New Zealander vs Icelander Male Poverty
COMPARE
New Zealander
Icelander
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
New Zealanders
Icelanders
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
82.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
68.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Icelander Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,891,318 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.326 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,599,836 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 2.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | New Zealander | Icelander |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 0.64% |
| Maximum | 32.1% | 57.1% |
| Range | 29.3% | 56.5% |
| Mean | 9.6% | 12.2% |
| Median | 8.7% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.9% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 9.8% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders and Icelanders by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Pakistani (10.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Belarus (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Chilean (10.7%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Armenian (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Venezuela (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Guamanian/Chamorro (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Syrian (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Germany (10.9%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
| Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
| Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |