New Zealander vs Czechoslovakian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
New Zealander
Czechoslovakian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
New Zealanders
Czechoslovakians
13.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
10.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
3.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Czechoslovakian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,681,215 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.280 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,828,483 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 1.8%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | New Zealander | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 8.6% | 8.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 80.0% |
Range | 91.4% | 71.4% |
Mean | 30.8% | 29.8% |
Median | 16.9% | 22.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 18.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.9% | 42.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.6% | 23.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.6% | 18.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.9% | 18.4% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders and Czechoslovakians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Central American (13.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Europe (13.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from the Azores (13.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Somali (13.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Denmark (13.2%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Ghana (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), British West Indian (13.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Luxembourger (13.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Bangladeshi (13.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and Belizean (13.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Central Americans | 10.9 /100 | #220 | Poor 13.2% |
New Zealanders | 10.7 /100 | #221 | Poor 13.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 10.0 /100 | #222 | Poor 13.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 9.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.2% |
Somalis | 9.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 8.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.2% |
Jamaicans | 7.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.2% |
Haitians | 7.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.2% |
Lebanese | 6.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.2% |
Europeans | 6.2 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.3% |
Ghanaians | 6.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.3% |
Slavs | 5.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.3% |
British | 4.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.3% |
Canadians | 4.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
Bangladeshis | 3.7 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.3% |
Luxembourgers | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
British West Indians | 3.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 3.0 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.4% |
Belizeans | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 13.4% |