Navajo vs Pakistani Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Navajo
Pakistani
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Navajo
Pakistanis
30.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
94.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Navajo vs Pakistani Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,444,505 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 30.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,571,147 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.692 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 100.5%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Navajo | Pakistani |
Minimum | 3.7% | 4.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 82.1% |
Range | 96.3% | 77.1% |
Mean | 40.5% | 21.9% |
Median | 38.7% | 15.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.0% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 50.2% | 21.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 28.1% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.4% | 17.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.3% | 17.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Navajo by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Yuman (30.6%, a difference of 1.2%), Pima (29.7%, a difference of 1.8%), Tohono O'odham (31.6%, a difference of 4.2%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and Lumbee (31.9%, a difference of 5.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.5% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 26.3% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.7% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 30.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.6% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.8% |
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Jordanian (15.1%, a difference of 0.21%), English (15.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and Serbian (15.1%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Romanians | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Dutch | 95.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Serbians | 95.2 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Jordanians | 95.1 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | England | 94.8 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Pakistanis | 94.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
English | 94.3 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Basques | 93.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Irish | 93.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Armenians | 93.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |