Moroccan vs Burmese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Moroccan
Burmese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Moroccans
Burmese
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
52.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Burmese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,405,308 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 21.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,450,200 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055 and weighted average of 18.3%, a difference of 14.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Moroccan | Burmese |
| Minimum | 10.5% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 53.5% | 43.2% |
| Range | 43.0% | 41.3% |
| Mean | 24.5% | 16.0% |
| Median | 20.6% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.0% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.3% | 19.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.4% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.1% | 6.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Moroccans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Armenian (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |