Mongolian vs West Indian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Mongolian
West Indian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Mongolians
West Indians
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
93.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs West Indian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,671,707 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,099,029 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of West Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.266 and weighted average of 22.3%, a difference of 10.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mongolian | West Indian |
Minimum | 3.5% | 7.2% |
Maximum | 47.1% | 52.4% |
Range | 43.6% | 45.1% |
Mean | 19.9% | 21.3% |
Median | 19.2% | 20.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 13.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.7% | 24.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 10.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 10.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Mongolians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Serbian (20.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Demographics Similar to West Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to West Indians are Immigrants from Middle Africa (22.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (22.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Bermudan (22.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Cape Verdean (22.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and French (22.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 4.2 /100 | #236 | Tragic 22.0% |
Vietnamese | 4.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 22.0% |
French Canadians | 2.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 22.2% |
Malaysians | 2.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 22.2% |
French | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 22.2% |
Cape Verdeans | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 22.3% |
Bermudans | 2.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 22.3% |
West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |