Mongolian vs Syrian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Mongolian
Syrian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Mongolians
Syrians
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
80.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
80.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Syrian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,209,736 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.011 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 265,791,569 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Syrians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.415 and weighted average of 8.6%, a difference of 0.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mongolian | Syrian |
| Minimum | 0.58% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 23.4% | 23.3% |
| Range | 22.8% | 22.3% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 7.7% |
| Median | 7.5% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Mongolians and Syrians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Brazilian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.62%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Brazilian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.62%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |