Mongolian vs South African Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Mongolian
South African
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Mongolians
South Africans
15.3%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
75.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs South African Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,619,201 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,650,915 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.643 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 5.5%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mongolian | South African |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 8.7% |
| Maximum | 35.2% | 59.2% |
| Range | 31.9% | 50.5% |
| Mean | 17.5% | 27.1% |
| Median | 17.4% | 20.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.6% | 15.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.8% | 46.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 30.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 15.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 15.3% |
Similar Demographics by Single Father Poverty
Demographics Similar to Mongolians by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Japanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cameroon (15.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Paraguayan (15.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Brazil (15.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Moldova (15.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Bangladeshis | 99.8 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.8 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.8 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Paraguayans | 99.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Japanese | 99.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Mongolians | 99.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Kenyans | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Maltese | 99.6 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Jordanian (16.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Nigerian (16.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (16.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from France (16.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (16.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 83.3 /100 | #142 | Excellent 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 83.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 81.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 80.7 /100 | #145 | Excellent 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 78.3 /100 | #146 | Good 16.1% |
| Colombians | 77.1 /100 | #147 | Good 16.1% |
| Nigerians | 76.8 /100 | #148 | Good 16.1% |
| South Africans | 75.1 /100 | #149 | Good 16.1% |
| Jordanians | 74.2 /100 | #150 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 72.1 /100 | #152 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 72.0 /100 | #153 | Good 16.1% |
| Mexicans | 70.1 /100 | #154 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 67.8 /100 | #155 | Good 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 66.0 /100 | #156 | Good 16.2% |