Maltese vs Immigrants from Australia Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,160,248 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,395,062 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.598 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 4.3%.

Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Maltese	Immigrants from Australia
Minimum	0.28%	5.7%
Maximum	39.3%	100.0%
Range	39.0%	94.3%
Mean	11.6%	22.7%
Median	10.3%	13.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.9%	10.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	12.2%	24.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.3%	14.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.8%	19.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.7%	19.3%

Demographics Similar to Maltese and Immigrants from Australia by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Bhutanese (11.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Tongan (11.5%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Greece (11.5%, a difference of 0.67%), Immigrants from Pakistan (11.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Bulgarian (11.5%, a difference of 0.91%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Egyptian (11.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Turkey (11.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Indonesia (11.8%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (11.8%, a difference of 0.69%), and Latvian (11.8%, a difference of 0.86%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Maltese	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 11.4%
Bhutanese	99.9 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 11.4%
Tongans	99.9 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 11.5%
Immigrants \| Greece	99.9 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 11.5%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	99.9 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 11.5%
Bulgarians	99.9 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 11.5%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 11.5%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.9 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 11.6%
Immigrants \| Asia	99.9 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 11.6%
Immigrants \| Poland	99.9 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 11.6%
Zimbabweans	99.9 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 11.7%
Cambodians	99.9 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 11.7%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.8 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 11.8%
Taiwanese	99.8 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 11.8%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	99.8 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 11.8%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 11.8%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	99.8 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 11.8%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.8 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 11.8%
Immigrants \| Turkey	99.7 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 11.9%
Egyptians	99.7 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 11.9%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.7 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 11.9%