Macedonian vs White/Caucasian Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Macedonian
White/Caucasian
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Macedonians
Whites/Caucasians
9.9%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
83.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Macedonian vs White/Caucasian Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,449,989 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.268 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 580,507,167 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.899 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 11.7%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
Measurement | Macedonian | White/Caucasian |
Minimum | 0.70% | 7.3% |
Maximum | 20.2% | 36.7% |
Range | 19.5% | 29.4% |
Mean | 7.7% | 15.6% |
Median | 8.0% | 14.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 10.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.8% | 19.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 6.5% |
Similar Demographics by Receiving Food Stamps
Demographics Similar to Macedonians by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Asia (9.9%, a difference of 0.060%), New Zealander (9.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Scottish (9.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Serbia (9.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.45%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Slovenes | 99.1 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.0 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Northern Europeans | 99.0 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Italians | 99.0 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Scottish | 98.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Asia | 98.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Macedonians | 98.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 9.9% |
New Zealanders | 98.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 98.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.0% |
South Africans | 98.7 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Laotians | 98.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Poles | 98.6 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (11.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Brazilian (11.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Soviet Union (11.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Hungarian (11.0%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Celtics | 87.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.7 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.0% |
Chileans | 86.2 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 86.0 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.0% |
Syrians | 85.5 /100 | #144 | Excellent 11.0% |
Hungarians | 85.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 11.0% |
Taiwanese | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 11.0% |
Whites/Caucasians | 83.9 /100 | #147 | Excellent 11.1% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 11.1% |
Brazilians | 83.2 /100 | #149 | Excellent 11.1% |
Soviet Union | 83.1 /100 | #150 | Excellent 11.1% |
Immigrants | Spain | 81.7 /100 | #151 | Excellent 11.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 81.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 11.1% |
Lebanese | 81.6 /100 | #153 | Excellent 11.1% |
Armenians | 81.4 /100 | #154 | Excellent 11.1% |