Macedonian vs Polish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Macedonian
Polish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Macedonians
Poles
11.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Macedonian vs Polish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,594,768 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.353 and weighted average of 11.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 559,323,396 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.225 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 1.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Macedonian | Polish |
Minimum | 0.74% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 22.4% | 87.1% |
Range | 21.7% | 85.5% |
Mean | 9.2% | 13.1% |
Median | 9.4% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.5% | 12.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Macedonians and Poles by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Poland (11.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Russian (11.8%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Danish (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Cypriot (11.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Greek (11.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Singapore (11.8%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |