Luxembourger vs Tongan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Tongan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Luxembourgers
Tongans
11.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
44th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Tongan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,645,818 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.074 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,866,719 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.143 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 2.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | Tongan |
Minimum | 1.8% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 19.8% | 22.7% |
Range | 18.1% | 17.6% |
Mean | 7.9% | 11.8% |
Median | 7.7% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.5% | 13.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Tongans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Iranian (11.7%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Korea (11.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.7%, a difference of 0.74%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Macedonian (11.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Poland (11.8%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |