Liberian vs Belizean Female Poverty
COMPARE
Liberian
Belizean
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Liberians
Belizeans
15.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Liberian vs Belizean Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,038,056 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.371 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,152,301 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Belizeans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.315 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 3.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Liberian | Belizean |
Minimum | 1.9% | 3.2% |
Maximum | 45.5% | 32.4% |
Range | 43.6% | 29.2% |
Mean | 15.7% | 16.0% |
Median | 14.0% | 15.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.8% | 19.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Liberians and Belizeans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (15.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (15.4%, a difference of 0.26%), Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.54%), Jamaican (15.5%, a difference of 0.85%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.98%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Belizeans are Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.76%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |